Do you agree that the ballot language proposed for two ballot petitions – the CodeNEXT petition and the Austin Efficiency Audit – was misleading to the voters of Austin and if so, will you help clarify to voters what these measures really mean – regardless of how you might vote on them? (Note: This article in the Austin Bullldog is a helpful review. Also note: the Texas Supreme Court ruled on August 27 th , in favor of the city of Austin – see KUT report here.) Rate your support on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most support and 1 being the least.

Kathie Tovo

City Council, District 9

Rating: 10 for Code Next; I believe the ballot language for the CodeNEXT petition should have included that term, and I voted (unsuccessfully) for that version.

Rating: 1 for Austin Efficiency Audit; I support the language related to the Austin Efficiency Audit that the Council voted to place on the ballot.